Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r177 - in components/xwiki-rendering: xwiki-rendering-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/block xwiki-rendering-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/macro xwiki-rendering-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/parser xwiki-rendering-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/transformation xwiki-rendering-api/src/test/java/org/xwiki/rendering xwiki-rendering-doxia xwiki-rendering-doxia/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/doxia/internal xwiki-rendering-doxia/src/main/java/or
vmassol (SVN) wrote:
Author: vmassol Date: 2008-06-03 20:58:01 +0200 (Tue, 03 Jun 2008) New Revision: 177
Log: XWIKI-654: Rewrite the Rendering engine
* Renamed Document into DOM. This is a better name and not in conflict with the XWiki Document. The other option was to name it DocumentAST or AST. Jean-Vincent preferred DOM and I agreed with him, although it was a close call ;)
I'm not sure DOM is a good name, as it already stands for something else. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
vmassol (SVN) wrote:
Author: vmassol Date: 2008-06-03 20:58:01 +0200 (Tue, 03 Jun 2008) New Revision: 177
Log: XWIKI-654: Rewrite the Rendering engine
* Renamed Document into DOM. This is a better name and not in conflict with the XWiki Document. The other option was to name it DocumentAST or AST. Jean-Vincent preferred DOM and I agreed with him, although it was a close call ;)
I'm not sure DOM is a good name, as it already stands for something else.
yes I was hesitating a bit because of this but it stand for Document Object Model and it's exactly what this is. Would you prefer AST? What would you suggest? Thanks -Vincent
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
vmassol (SVN) wrote:
Author: vmassol Date: 2008-06-03 20:58:01 +0200 (Tue, 03 Jun 2008) New Revision: 177
Log: XWIKI-654: Rewrite the Rendering engine
* Renamed Document into DOM. This is a better name and not in conflict with the XWiki Document. The other option was to name it DocumentAST or AST. Jean-Vincent preferred DOM and I agreed with him, although it was a close call ;) I'm not sure DOM is a good name, as it already stands for something else.
yes I was hesitating a bit because of this but it stand for Document Object Model and it's exactly what this is.
Would you prefer AST? What would you suggest?
Well, at W3C DOM is the basic DOM, and after that they make variations of *OM. So we could have XDOM (XWiki Document Object Model). -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Jun 4, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jun 4, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
vmassol (SVN) wrote:
Author: vmassol Date: 2008-06-03 20:58:01 +0200 (Tue, 03 Jun 2008) New Revision: 177
Log: XWIKI-654: Rewrite the Rendering engine
* Renamed Document into DOM. This is a better name and not in conflict with the XWiki Document. The other option was to name it DocumentAST or AST. Jean-Vincent preferred DOM and I agreed with him, although it was a close call ;) I'm not sure DOM is a good name, as it already stands for something else.
yes I was hesitating a bit because of this but it stand for Document Object Model and it's exactly what this is.
Would you prefer AST? What would you suggest?
Well, at W3C DOM is the basic DOM, and after that they make variations of *OM. So we could have XDOM (XWiki Document Object Model).
Not bad. What about http://www.garshol.priv.no/download/xmltools/prod/ExtDOM.html ? :) -Vincent
participants (2)
-
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol