[xwiki-devs] [Brainstorming] Remove old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Hi devs, WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o? Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki... Thanks -Vincent
We could move the documentation of those macros under http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... to not loose it (but yes not make them extensions from e.x.o. point of view). On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki...
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
On 26 May 2016, at 09:17, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com> wrote:
We could move the documentation of those macros under http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... to not loose it (but yes not make them extensions from e.x.o. point of view).
Indeed, now that we support nested pages, should be easy enough. Thanks -Vincent
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki...
Thanks -Vincent
i.e. making http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... a space and just moving those pages there (without their ExtensionClass object) On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com> wrote:
We could move the documentation of those macros under http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... to not loose it (but yes not make them extensions from e.x.o. point of view).
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki...
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Thomas Mortagne
+0 Thanks, Caty On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com
wrote:
i.e. making http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... a space and just moving those pages there (without their ExtensionClass object)
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com> wrote:
We could move the documentation of those macros under
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re...
to not loose it (but yes not make them extensions from e.x.o. point of view).
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki...
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 Thanks, Eduard On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) < valicac@gmail.com> wrote:
+0
Thanks, Caty
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Mortagne < thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com
wrote:
i.e. making
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re...
a space and just moving those pages there (without their ExtensionClass object)
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com> wrote:
We could move the documentation of those macros under
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re...
to not loose it (but yes not make them extensions from e.x.o. point of view).
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki...
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com
wrote:
i.e. making http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... a space and just moving those pages there (without their ExtensionClass object
+1 for Thomas' proposal. Thanks, Marius
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com> wrote:
We could move the documentation of those macros under
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re...
to not loose it (but yes not make them extensions from e.x.o. point of view).
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki...
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 for this. On 05/26/2016 03:18 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
i.e. making http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... a space and just moving those pages there (without their ExtensionClass object)
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com> wrote:
We could move the documentation of those macros under http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... to not loose it (but yes not make them extensions from e.x.o. point of view).
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki...
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
Done, see http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Old+XWiki+1.0+syntax+re... 15 extensions removed! Thanks -Vincent
On 26 May 2016, at 09:07, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
WDYT about removing the old Radeox macros from e.x.o?
Rationale: they’re confusing (since Radeox has been removed from the platform) and I don’t think anyone is interested in them anymore. Note that if you install the 1.0 rendering you’ll still get them anyway. They just won’t be documented but I don’t feel it’s a big deal at all. An alternative (more work) would be to move the page on some old.xwiki.org wiki...
Thanks -Vincent
participants (6)
-
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Eduard Moraru -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol