[xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Release XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official in Rendering 3.4
Hi devs, I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4. Rationale ======== * It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa ) Migration aspects ============== * I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages Here's my +1 Thanks -Vincent
+1 On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 17:07, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
+1 Thanks, Marius On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 Thanks, Eduard On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks, Marius
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 18:27, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks, Eduard
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea < mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks, Marius
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO
On 12/06/2011 10:07 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
+1. Should we also convert all existing 2.0 documents to 2.1, directly by replacing the document syntax in the sources? I'd say +1. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Dec 6, 2011, at 8:20 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 12/06/2011 10:07 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
+1.
Should we also convert all existing 2.0 documents to 2.1, directly by replacing the document syntax in the sources? I'd say +1.
I'm fine with that too, it's a bit of work though (need to run conversion script mentioned above, then export all pages and save them in SCM, verify they all work fine). BTW we still have XWiki Syntax 1.0 documents in standard XE… ;) I'd be more in favor of finishing their conversion for the 3.x cycle if we have some time. If we can do both then great. Thanks -Vincent
+1 Best regards, Andreas Jonsson 2011-12-06 16:07, Vincent Massol skrev:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 Regards, Sorin B. On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent@massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
The vote is passed with 9 +1, no 0, no -1. I've just committed it. Thanks -Vincent On Dec 6, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
I'd like to propose releasing XWiki Syntax 2.1 as official (it's currently experimental) for XWiki Rendering 3.4.
Rationale ========
* It has useful expanded support for links and images compared to 2.0 * It's been "experimental" for a long time and people are already using it * It would be nice to release it in the 3.x cycle since it was started in that cycle * That would allow us to start XWiki Syntax 2.2 for the 4.x cycle (see outstanding items at http://tinyurl.com/6pdt5oa )
Migration aspects ==============
* I don't think we need to mandate moving to 2.1 for users. They can keep using 2.0 if they want * We should make it the default wiki syntax starting in XE 3.4, leaving 2.0 available by default * I believe there's no conversion issue between 2.0 and 2.1 so it shouldn't be an issue for users wanting to switch. * We could provide a migration script on extensions.xwiki.org for users wanting to convert all their 2.0 pages into 2.1 pages
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
participants (9)
-
Andreas Jonsson -
Denis Gervalle -
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Eduard Moraru -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Sorin Burjan -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol