On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

hel-o wrote:

...

Hi,

how can i migrate existing blog posts to the new blog application?

Visit /xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Migration using an administrator account.

Hint: We need updated doc on http://code.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Applications/BlogApplication Thanks -Vincent http://xwiki.com http://xwiki.org http://massol.net

Hi, On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:51 PM, hel-o wrote:

Thanks,

worked, one more question. I used a flikr macro in my blog. As i understand the new blog application uses the new syntax.

Tried to change the syntax for the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HMacros macro -> macro didn't work.

Tried to link to the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HImages picture (which schoud be possible in the new syntax) -> didn't work.

Know Bugs or did i do something wrong?

2 things: * the new blog app doesn't use the new syntax. It's independent. * in the new syntax if you need to use an existing velocity macro that generate HTML you'll need to wrap it in html macro for now (there's an issue to fix this and thus make it easier) for ex: {{html}}{{velocity}}#flickr(...){{/velocity}}{{/html}} * for the image you need to show us what you've typed. It should work just fine. Thanks -Vincent

hel.

Sergiu Dumitriu-2 wrote:

...

hel-o wrote:

...

Hi,

how can i migrate existing blog posts to the new blog application?

Visit /xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Migration using an administrator account.

On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

hel-o wrote:

...

Thanks,

worked, one more question. I used a flikr macro in my blog. As i understand the new blog application uses the new syntax.

Tried to change the syntax for the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HMacros macro -> macro didn't work.

Tried to link to the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HImages picture (which schoud be possible in the new syntax) -> didn't work.

Know Bugs or did i do something wrong?

That's not true, the new application still uses the old syntax. The new one is not stable and mature enough to be the default for the wiki.

I wouldn't quite say that in 1.8RC1. It's quite stable IMO and we do need people to use it to know the area that we still need to improve (the new rendering core is quite stable, probably way more than the old syntax but there are some integration parts that we probably still need to work on). And it can be set on a page by page basis so you don't have to commit your full wiki to use it. Thanks -Vincent http://xwiki.com http://xwiki.org http://massol.net

Hi, On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:11 PM, hel-o wrote:

I try (if possible) to use only the new syntax in this wiki. And in its quite stable for most parts. The new WYSIWYG is better, but it laks functionality the old one had.

Which features are you looking for that are lacking?

But back to my Blog problem:

http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/

flickrusertag Macro didn't work after update.

When i use the velocity code the result is an error

The image link and the {{velocity}} things show that no new syntax is used:wistle:

Using the Macro on a normal Page works

http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Main/

So it seems no code can be used in the new Blog application

Yes there seems to be some issues mixing the blog app written in 1.0 syntax with blog pages written in 2.0 syntax. I'll look into it to understand the problem. Thanks -Vincent

vmassol wrote:

...

On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

...

hel-o wrote:

...

Thanks,

worked, one more question. I used a flikr macro in my blog. As i understand the new blog application uses the new syntax.

Tried to change the syntax for the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HMacros macro -> macro didn't work.

Tried to link to the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HImages picture (which schoud be possible in the new syntax) -> didn't work.

Know Bugs or did i do something wrong?

That's not true, the new application still uses the old syntax. The new one is not stable and mature enough to be the default for the wiki.

I wouldn't quite say that in 1.8RC1. It's quite stable IMO and we do need people to use it to know the area that we still need to improve (the new rendering core is quite stable, probably way more than the old syntax but there are some integration parts that we probably still need to work on).

And it can be set on a page by page basis so you don't have to commit your full wiki to use it.

Thanks -Vincent http://xwiki.com http://xwiki.org http://massol.net

On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi,

On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:11 PM, hel-o wrote:

...

I try (if possible) to use only the new syntax in this wiki. And in its quite stable for most parts. The new WYSIWYG is better, but it laks functionality the old one had.

Which features are you looking for that are lacking?

...

But back to my Blog problem:

http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/

flickrusertag Macro didn't work after update.

When i use the velocity code the result is an error

The image link and the {{velocity}} things show that no new syntax is used:wistle:

Using the Macro on a normal Page works

http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Main/

So it seems no code can be used in the new Blog application

Yes there seems to be some issues mixing the blog app written in 1.0 syntax with blog pages written in 2.0 syntax. I'll look into it to understand the problem.

One problem is in our xwiki syntax 1.0 to 2.0 converter. What happens is that when you convert a blog page into 2.0 syntax it calls Blog.BlogPostSheet which is in xwiki 1.0 syntax so the new include macro will automatically try to convert it to 2.0 syntax and there seems to be some problem. Raised as comments in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3107 The second problem is on the blog WebHome page (which is syntax 1.0). Since some blog pages are in syntax 2.0 their content are rendered in syntax 2.0 but the syntax 1.0 page cannot display 2.0 content.... I'm not sure yet how to solve this one... Thanks -Vincent

...

vmassol wrote:

...

On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

...

hel-o wrote:

...

Thanks,

worked, one more question. I used a flikr macro in my blog. As i understand the new blog application uses the new syntax.

Tried to change the syntax for the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HMacros macro -> macro didn't work.

Tried to link to the http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/XWikiSyntax#HImages picture (which schoud be possible in the new syntax) -> didn't work.

Know Bugs or did i do something wrong?

That's not true, the new application still uses the old syntax. The new one is not stable and mature enough to be the default for the wiki.

I wouldn't quite say that in 1.8RC1. It's quite stable IMO and we do need people to use it to know the area that we still need to improve (the new rendering core is quite stable, probably way more than the old syntax but there are some integration parts that we probably still need to work on).

And it can be set on a page by page basis so you don't have to commit your full wiki to use it.

Thanks -Vincent http://xwiki.com http://xwiki.org http://massol.net

Hi, vmassol wrote:

Hi,

On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:11 PM, hel-o wrote:

...

I try (if possible) to use only the new syntax in this wiki. And in its quite stable for most parts. The new WYSIWYG is better, but it laks functionality the old one had.

Which features are you looking for that are lacking?

The new link functionality is not very handy, especially in a virtual environment (i can see all wikis, which i should not) no target option in the web link tab, limited search possibilities in wiki tab, no link to file tab ... There also features that are great (listing images of all pages in the wiki) hel. ----- Helmut Lehner hel@hel.at -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Migrate-blog-posts-to-new-blog-%2818RC1%29-tp2395714p23... Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Vincent Massol wrote:

On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:

...

Hi,

On Feb 27, 2009, at 6:11 PM, hel-o wrote:

...

I try (if possible) to use only the new syntax in this wiki. And in its quite stable for most parts. The new WYSIWYG is better, but it laks functionality the old one had. Which features are you looking for that are lacking?

...

But back to my Blog problem:

http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/

flickrusertag Macro didn't work after update.

When i use the velocity code the result is an error

The image link and the {{velocity}} things show that no new syntax is used:wistle:

Using the Macro on a normal Page works

http://semantic-web.hel.at/xwiki/bin/view/Main/

So it seems no code can be used in the new Blog application Yes there seems to be some issues mixing the blog app written in 1.0 syntax with blog pages written in 2.0 syntax. I'll look into it to understand the problem.

One problem is in our xwiki syntax 1.0 to 2.0 converter. What happens is that when you convert a blog page into 2.0 syntax it calls Blog.BlogPostSheet which is in xwiki 1.0 syntax so the new include macro will automatically try to convert it to 2.0 syntax and there seems to be some problem. Raised as comments in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3107

Why does the include try to do this?

The second problem is on the blog WebHome page (which is syntax 1.0). Since some blog pages are in syntax 2.0 their content are rendered in syntax 2.0 but the syntax 1.0 page cannot display 2.0 content.... I'm not sure yet how to solve this one...

Theoretically the blog displays the content in the document's syntax, as it calls $entryDoc.getRenderedContent($entryContent, $entryDoc.syntaxId). Is there a bug here too? -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/

Hi, vmassol wrote:

ok. We're currently working on implementing the new dialog boxes (the ones currently in were done roughly while waiting for the new ones). If you're interested here are the mockups for the new dialog boxes: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterface

Thanks -Vincent

looks good, but is it really the default case that you have more than one wiki. There schould at least be a setting in the configuration to enable (or disable) that. ----- Helmut Lehner hel@hel.at -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Migrate-blog-posts-to-new-blog-%2818RC1%29-tp2395714p24... Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.