Same as Sergiu, I prefer shorter names but artifactId is not that bad. So 0. Thanks, Marius On 04/05/2011 02:19 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu<sergiu@xwiki.com> wrote:
On 04/05/2011 11:03 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi devs,
The proposal is to use artifactid as directory names.
Note that this is what I did for commons and rendering when I did the move to top level project. You can check how it looks like here: http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/commons/ http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/rendering/
I suggest we keep one strategy only for consistency.
Some discussion here too: http://www.sonatype.com/people/2011/01/maven-tip-project-directories-and-art...
I know there are some cons (see my comment in the link above) but overall I find it simple to implement and with autocompletion not such a big issue.
WDYT?
0. I'd prefer shorter names, but I don't have a strong preference for it. Either way works.
Same as Sergiu, I would prefer shorter names ; but no strong feelings either. 0
Jerome
If you don't like this then please propose an alternative solution and remember that we'll need to refactor commons and rendering in this case too.
Thanks -Vincent
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs