Le mer. 17 oct. 2018 à 10:47, Simon Urli <simon.urli@xwiki.com> a écrit :
On 10/17/18 10:35 AM, Guillaume Delhumeau wrote:
I'm OK.
<OFF TOPIC> I'm just thinking about an other particular case: Imagine you have 3 event listeners (A, B, C): - A receives the event and perform some actions (saving something in the database). - B receives the event and cancels it - C don't receive the event because it had been canceled
However, we may want to resend some infos to listener A so it can rollback its actions (otherwise we end up with bad info in the database).
Do we have a strategy for this?
I don't think we have a strategy for that, but we might add a new method in EventListener:
onRollback(CancelableEvent canceledEvent, Object source, Object data)
and store somewhere the list of called listener to be able to call their rollback method if the event has been cancelled. Should do the trick, WDYT?
Sounds like a good idea, indeed. Or it could be called onCanceled() instead of onRollback, since the rollback is what we expect, not the event that is triggered.
</OFF TOPIC>
Le mer. 17 oct. 2018 à 09:09, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com> a écrit :
+1 to stopping event propagation when it's cancelled On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 6:07 PM Simon Urli <simon.urli@xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
the current behaviour of the ObservationManager is to always triggers the listeners if it matches the events. Now regarding the CancelableEvents, the match is only done on the type of the event and some given filter rules, but never with its cancel status: if an event is cancelled, the matching listeners are always triggered.
I propose to change that behaviour, to trigger listeners only if the CancelableEvents are not canceled: basically, a cancelled event
wouldn't
match any listener.
My primary reason for wanting that change is that the current behaviour led to a bad UX: if an event triggers multiple questions, no matter if one is cancelled, all questions will be asked to the user.
Do you know if the current behaviour is required at some places? Else do you agree on changing it?
Simon -- Simon Urli Software Engineer at XWiki SAS simon.urli@xwiki.com More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Simon Urli Software Engineer at XWiki SAS simon.urli@xwiki.com More about us at http://www.xwiki.com
-- Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau@xwiki.com) Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS Committer on the XWiki.org project